Try Savers & Rib Breakers 12: RWC Edition – Country friendly version

first_imgSunday Apr 15, 2012 Try Savers & Rib Breakers 12: RWC Edition – Country friendly version Try Savers & Rib Breakers 12: RWC edition has just been posted on the homepage, but the video may be blocked in some regions, such as Germany (this is due to an issue with the music). If that’s the case, the above video should work. If it doesn’t, it’s been removed. View the original post here, and enter the competition for some RWC boots.ADVERTISEMENT Posted By: rugbydump Share Send Thanks Sorry there has been an error random Related Articles 445 WEEKS AGO Steve Hansen discusses Andrew Hore incident… 446 WEEKS AGO Italy vs Australia – Live stream 446 WEEKS AGO Catch up with Ken Cowen and School of Hard… From the WebThis Video Will Soon Be Banned. Watch Before It’s DeletedSecrets RevealedIf You Have Ringing Ears Do This Immediately (Ends Tinnitus)Healthier LivingDoctors Stunned: She Removes Her Wrinkles With This Inexpensive TipSmart Life Reports30+ Everyday Items with a Secret Hidden PurposeNueey10 Types of Women You Should Never MarryNueeyShe Was the Most Beautiful Girl in the World. What She Looks Like Now is InsaneNueeyThe content you see here is paid for by the advertiser or content provider whose link you click on, and is recommended to you by Revcontent. As the leading platform for native advertising and content recommendation, Revcontent uses interest based targeting to select content that we think will be of particular interest to you. We encourage you to view your opt out options in Revcontent’s Privacy PolicyWant your content to appear on sites like this?Increase Your Engagement Now!Want to report this publisher’s content as misinformation?Submit a ReportGot it, thanks!Remove Content Link?Please choose a reason below:Fake NewsMisleadingNot InterestedOffensiveRepetitiveSubmitCancellast_img read more

‘Govt Duty Bound To Make Available To Public Reasonably Priced Hard Copies Of Bare Acts, Rules Etc’ : Plea In SC

first_imgTop Stories’Govt Duty Bound To Make Available To Public Reasonably Priced Hard Copies Of Bare Acts, Rules Etc’ : Plea In SC Radhika Roy22 May 2020 7:39 AMShare This – xAllowing private parties to profit out of publishing bare acts results in infringement of citizen’s right to know, contends the petitioner.The Supreme Court of India has issued notice in a Public Interest Litigation which seeks for directions to the Central Government with respect to their responsibility in publishing and ensuring availability of authentic Bare Acts, Rules et al at a reasonable price.The matter came up before a Bench of Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, Justices AS Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy, who proceeded…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe Supreme Court of India has issued notice in a Public Interest Litigation which seeks for directions to the Central Government with respect to their responsibility in publishing and ensuring availability of authentic Bare Acts, Rules et al at a reasonable price.The matter came up before a Bench of Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, Justices AS Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy, who proceeded to issue notice in the plea. The petition also raises the question of copyright held by the government in the Acts of Parliament and its failure to give effect to the provisions of Copyright Act in larger public interest. The plea further contends that failure of the government to ensure availability of all Acts of Parliament, Notifications, Regulations etc. is a violation of a citizen’s “right to know” under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. “The Respondents cannot be allowed to infringe with impunity, fundamental right of citizens of India being “Right to Know”, which obliges Respondents to bring to the knowledge of citizens as regards the law that is prevalent as on date and to disseminate knowledge about the same by way of publishing Acts of Parliament, Rules, Notifications, Regulations etc. which are not only reasonably priced, but accurate and authentic as well”. It is additionally averred in the plea that the government has invariably allowed the public to suffer by allowing “some private businessmen” to publish these Bare Acts and, as a consequence, these businessmen have created a monopoly and are charging the public exorbitant prices for the same. Furthermore, as the “Acts of Parliament etc. are admittedly in public domain and under copyright ownership of Government, therefore, the same could not have been allowed to be used by selected few for commercial gains and at best, could only have been used for personal or professional use by public at large….Therefore, such gross abuse of power cannot be allowed to supersede the larger public interest”. Filed by Advocate Prashant Bhushan on behalf of Arpit Bhargava, the plea raises the following questions of law: A. Whether the government is duty bound to publish and make available authentic, accurate and reasonably priced hard copies of all Acts of Parliament, Rules, Notifications, Regulations etc. along with amendments from time to time? B. Whether “right to know” under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India extends to ensuring availability of all Acts of Parliament, Rules, Notifications, Regulations etc. along with amendments from time to time to public at large? C. Whether government is the copyright owner in the Acts of Parliament along with Rules, Regulations, Notifications etc. in terms of provisions of Copyright Act, 1957, in particular Section 17(d)? D. Whether act of publishing “Bare Acts” by parties other than government constitute infringement of copyright of government in terms of Section 52(1)(q) of Copyright Act, 1957? By raising these questions, the petition goes on to challenge the Delhi High Court order rendered in 2019, wherein the PIL filed before the HC was disposed of without a direction that “as and when there is any violation of the Copyright Act 1957, especially Section 52 read with Section 52(K); 17(d) and other provisions of the Constitution of India, action will be taken by the Respondents in accordance with law, rules, regulations and government policies applicable to the facts and cirumstances of the case against erring publishers”. Next Storylast_img read more